You keep using that word. I do not think it means what your think it means. - Inigo Montoya, The Princess Bride

By the way, George, I have a few points for you:

1. We are not impressed with Lybia's "disarmament". We might have been, had not Iran and North Korea found their way into the club, with impunity, simultaneously with Lybia's "disarmament".

2. What, exactly, was Saddam "systematically deceiving" those weapons inspectors about? Considering that it turns out that there were no WMD, how, exactly, was diplomacy "falling apart"? I mean it. Can you answer this, and if not, what the hell were you smoking during this debate?

3. What was that about Saddam being a threat? I'm not sure I caught that. Did you say that he was a threat? Oh, good.

4. I didn't get any mixed messages from you. You were 100% clear that you are against mixed messages, and that you do not have a defensible case that your opponent is liable to send them. Also, we read you loud and clear on that "more of the same" platform in your campaign.

5. Nuclear non-proliferation. There is a good reason that Kerry was able to say it without hesitation, and there was an equally good reason that you had to hesitatingly follow his leadership on that issue. Because you have taken your eye off of one of the bigger balls, in order to focus on the development of mini-nukes and to follow your personal vendetta in Iraq.

6. Vociferously means "vocally". You, the most powerful person in the world, are an idiot who cannot even speak your own native language.

7. Remember when you almost won because Al Gore sighed too much? You just rolled your eyes and smirked your way out of the White House. He who lives by it, hallelujah, dies by it.

8. John Kerry was much more presidential than you, all the while managing to answer most of the major issues satisfactorily, while you were obviously opening canned responses whether appropriate or not. I'm so glad that you had your ass kicked.