February 16, 2006

What have we learned?

from - RSA

Dick Cheney's hunting fiasco might have been avoided if he had followed a few simple rules. He followed many but not all of them, and look what happened. . .

  1. Do be the Vice President of the United States. Not all of the rules that follow will work otherwise.

  2. Don't have two drunk driving convictions in your youthful past. This will only raise unpleasant questions.

  3. Don't have a drink with lunch before going out hunting.

  4. Don't lose track of your hunting companions.

  5. Don't fire your shotgun into the setting sun.

  6. Don't--and this is an important point--don't shoot a 78 year old man in the face with your shotgun.

  7. Do see to your companion's injuries if you have ignored Rule 6.

  8. Don't have a cocktail after you get back to the house.

  9. Don't tell anyone about the incident. If someone goes to the press and says that it's without your knowledge, contradict that person and say that it was all part of the plan.

  10. Do talk to the police immediately, unless you have broken Rules 2, 3, and 8. If you have, skip to the next rule.

  11. Don't talk to the police. Instead when they arrive, say that they should come back the next day. If they seem reluctant, tell them that you are the Vice President of the United States (see Rule 1).

  12. Don't let police officers make fun of your fine $7500 Italian hunting piece. Some of your friends have single Italian shoes that cost more than that.

  13. Don't hide like a rabbit after the incident. This will only cause more talk.

  14. Do avoid any conversational topic that may lead to the observation that you will take over if anything happens to the President of the United States.

::

Posted by RSA at February 16, 2006 11:45 AM
Comments

#12 is my favorite.

And I just have to ask this question.

Do you think it is unfair for any person to assume that the Vice-President had been drinking when the accident occurred?

To me that is the only rational explanation for why the events would have transpired the way they did.

univar.jpg Posted by Buck on February 16, 2006 12:29 PM
Link to comment

Personally, I don't think it's an unfair assumption. If I read a news story in which Joe Citizen did exactly what Cheney did, I'd assume that Joe had been drinking. Given that Cheney has no strong attachments to the truth, I don't find his version especially convincing.

univar.jpg Posted by RSA on February 16, 2006 01:01 PM
Link to comment

That's exactly the problem- he behaved like a drunken Joe Citizen! A drunken politician would have left his victim to die while he went home to sleep it off. In the morning, refreshed, he would call his political advisers and supporters, and then- and ONLY then- would he have called the police. That's what Kennedy did, and he was a viable Presidential candidate less than ten years later!

univar.jpg Posted by Joel Monka on February 16, 2006 06:46 PM
Link to comment

In talking with conservative acquaintances elsewhere, I notice that somehow they manage to hold in their heads at the same time the idea that Cheney should be given the benefit of the doubt about whether he'd been drinking or not, while Kennedy's drinking should be taken for granted. Weird.

univar.jpg Posted by RSA on February 17, 2006 11:43 AM
Link to comment
Comments for this entry are closed. Please leave your notes on a more recent comment thread.