February 24, 2006

Money matters

from - RSA

Browsing the web, looking for information on a topic unrelated to this post, I happened across a U.S. census document that described how "net worth" is figured. It turns out that as of five years ago, the median net worth [pdf document] for a household in the U.S. was about $50,000, if I'm reading the document correctly. (I've always wondered how this was figured out.)
I. Assets
Interest-earning assets held at financial institutions
  Passbook savings account
  Money market deposit accounts
  Certificate of deposit
  Interest-earning checking accounts
Other interest-earning assets
  U.S. Government securities
  Municipal or corporate bonds
Stocks and mutual fund shares
Rental property
Mortgages held for sale of real estate
Amount due from sale of business or property
Regular checking accounts
U.S. savings bonds
Home ownership
Vacation homes and other real estate
IRA and Keogh accounts
401K and thrift savings plans
Motor vehicles
Other financial assets
II. Liabilities
Secured liabilities
  Margin and broker accounts
  Mortgages on own home
  Mortgages on rental property
  Mortgages on other homes or real estate
  Debt on business or profession
  Vehicle loans
Unsecured liabilities
  Credit card and store bills
  Doctor, dentist, hospital, and nursing home bills
  Loans from individuals
  Loans from financial institutions
  Educational loans
  Other unsecured liabilities
I think that I have a net worth somewhere between 0 and minus $50,000, mainly due to a house mortgage. Oh, well. Of course, on a global scale, I am very rich: if you earn more than $47,500 (just above the median household income in the U.S.), you earn more than 99% of the rest of the world. ::

Posted by RSA at February 24, 2006 01:20 PM
Comments
if you earn more than $47,500 (just above the median household income in the U.S.), you earn more than 99% of the rest of the world.

That is an incredible tidbit of information. I really think that most of us know this we just do not give it enough serious thought. In this great country of ours it is so simple to get by financially. Most of our problems stem from the fact that we make $47,500 per year but spend $95,000.

Simplify, simplify. My God, if Thoreau could only see us now.

We sit at a banquet table the likes of which has never been seen before and still we cannot get enough to eat.

I have no idea what I am worth to the bankers but I hope that my worth to my family is equal to their worth to me. You can't put a dollar figure on that.

univar.jpg Posted by Buck on February 24, 2006 05:34 PM
Link to comment

If the reason for you negative net worth is your mortgage then you are probably ahead of the game because the mortgage is offset by the actual property.

Most lenders won't lend you more for the house than it is worth, so unless you live in a an area that has seen a "pop" in the housing bubble your house is likely appreciating in value.

If you're like me, this doesn't make you wealthy but it does keep you above $0

univar.jpg Posted by m on February 25, 2006 09:48 PM
Link to comment

Thanks, m, that's a good point that I'd forgotten about. I was just thinking about what I owed on my mortgage compared with what I had in the bank (loosely speaking). There has been some appreciation that offsets what I owe--I think just about bringing me even to $0. Cool!

Buck, I really wish it were easier to simplify. I think more people would jump on the bandwagon.

univar.jpg Posted by RSA on February 26, 2006 11:51 AM
Link to comment
Comments for this entry are closed. Please leave your notes on a more recent comment thread.